UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Form
10-Q
[X]
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014
[ ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission
file number 000-54405
JAMESON
STANFORD RESOURCES CORPORATION
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada |
|
90-0963619 |
(State
or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S.
Employer |
incorporation
or organization) |
|
Identification
No.) |
605
W. Knox Rd., Suite 202, Tempe, AZ |
|
85284 |
(Address
of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip
Code) |
(702)
933-0808
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Not
applicable.
(Former
Name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Copies
of Communications to:
Laura
Anthony, Esq.
Legal&
Compliance, LLC
330
Clematis Street, Suite 217
West
Palm Beach, FL 33401
(561)
514-0936
Fax
(561) 514-0832
Indicate
by check mark whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
[X] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
[X] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer [ ] |
Accelerated
filer [ ] |
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting
company [X] |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
[ ] No [X]
The
number of shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value, issued and outstanding on October 31, 2014, was 15,644,729 shares.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations” in Item 2 of Part I of this report include forward-looking statements. These forward looking statements are
based on our management’s current expectations and beliefs and involve numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause
actual results to differ materially from expectations. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology
such as “may,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,”
“estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “proposed,” “intended,” or “continue”
or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. You should read statements that contain these words carefully,
because they discuss our expectations about our future operating results or our future financial condition or state other “forward-looking”
information. Many factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements,
including but not limited to: variability of our future revenues and financial performance; risks associated with product development
and technological changes; the acceptance of our products in the marketplace by potential future customers; general economic conditions.
You should be aware that the occurrence of any of the events described in this Quarterly Report could substantially harm our business,
results of operations and financial condition, and that upon the occurrence of any of these events, the trading price of our securities
could decline. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot
guarantee future results, growth rates, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We are under no duty to update any of
the forward-looking statements after the date of this Quarterly Report to conform these statements to actual results.
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT REGARDING MINERALIZED MATERIAL
“Mineralized
material” as used in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, although permissible under the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission’s (“SEC”) Industry Guide 7, does not indicate “reserves” by SEC standards. We cannot
be certain that any deposits from the Star Mountain/Chopar Mine, (b) Spor Mountain/Dugway Minerals Claim and Ogden Bay Wildlife
Management Area in Weber County, Utah will ever be confirmed or converted into SEC Industry Guide 7 compliant “reserves”.
Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the disclosed mineralized material estimates will ever be confirmed
or converted into reserves or that mineralized material can be economically or legally extracted.
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JAMESON
STANFORD RESOURCES CORPORATION
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| |
Mar
31, 2014 | | |
Dec
31, 2013 | |
| |
(unaudited) | | |
| |
ASSETS | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
CURRENT ASSETS | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash and
cash equivalents | |
$ | 136,595 | | |
$ | 79 | |
Prepaid expenses | |
| 19,763 | | |
| 31,620 | |
Deposits | |
| 5,100 | | |
| 5,100 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total
current assets | |
| 161,458 | | |
| 36,799 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Property & equipment,
net | |
| 90,546 | | |
| 95,616 | |
Advances to related
party shareholder | |
| 1,426,261 | | |
| 1,262,836 | |
Mineral rights | |
| 25,869 | | |
| 25,869 | |
Surety
bond | |
| 24,325 | | |
| 24,325 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
TOTAL ASSETS | |
$ | 1,728,459 | | |
$ | 1,445,445 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts payable and
accrued expenses | |
$ | 396,497 | | |
$ | 420,470 | |
Accrued compensation | |
| - | | |
| 4,000 | |
Contract payable | |
| 7,460 | | |
| 24,366 | |
Stipulated
agreement liability, related party | |
| 79,272 | | |
| 91,772 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total
current liabilities | |
| 483,229 | | |
| 540,608 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Convertible
Debt | |
| 506,837 | | |
| 178,858 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total
Liabilities | |
| 990,066 | | |
| 719,466 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock, authorized
350,000,000 shares, $.0001 par value, 40,903,862 and 40,253,862 shares issued and outstanding, respectively | |
$ | 40,904 | | |
$ | 40,254 | |
Additional paid in
capital | |
| 5,120,299 | | |
| 4,366,960 | |
Accumulated
deficit | |
| (4,422,810 | ) | |
| (3,681,235 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total
Stockholder’s Equity | |
| 738,393 | | |
| 725,979 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |
$ | 1,728,459 | | |
$ | 1,445,445 | |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
JAMESON
STANFORD RESOURCES CORPORATION
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
| |
Three
Months Ended | |
| |
Mar
31, 2014 | | |
Mar
31, 2013 | |
OPERATING REVENUES | |
| | | |
| | |
Revenue | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
OPERATING EXPENSES | |
| | | |
| | |
Executive compensation | |
| 24,000
| | |
| 45,000 | |
Exploration and development
costs | |
| 21,722 | | |
| 115,277 | |
General
and administrative | |
| 531,160 | | |
| 156,756 | |
General
and administrative - related party | |
| - | | |
| 10,783 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total Operating
Expenses | |
| 576,882 | | |
| 327,816 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Loss from Operations | |
| (576,882 | ) | |
| (327,816 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
OTHER INCOME AND (EXPENSE) | |
| | | |
| | |
Interest expense,
related party | |
| - | | |
| (5,995 | ) |
Interest
expense | |
| (164,693 | ) | |
| (1,356 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total
Other Income (Expense) | |
| (164,693 | ) | |
| (7,351 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
NET LOSS | |
| (741,575 | ) | |
| (335,167 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Basic and Diluted
Loss Per Share | |
$ | (0.02 | ) | |
$ | (0.01 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Weighted Average
Number of Common Shares Outstanding | |
| 40,903,862 | | |
| 31,300,000 | |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
JAMESON
STANFORD RESOURCES CORPORATION
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
| |
Three
Months Ended | |
| |
Mar
31, 2014 | | |
Mar
31, 2013 | |
Cash flows from operating activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
$ | (741,575 | ) | |
$ | (335,167 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Depreciation | |
| 5,070 | | |
| 2,194 | |
Imputed interest | |
| - | | |
| 5,996 | |
Shares issued for services | |
| 455,000 | | |
| - | |
Amortization of debt discount | |
| 126,968 | | |
| - | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities | |
| | | |
| | |
Prepaid expenses | |
| 11,857 | | |
| - | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | |
| (60,240 | ) | |
| 174,662 | |
Accrued interest | |
| 36,267 | | |
| 1,355 | |
Accrued compensation | |
| (4,000 | ) | |
| (120,000 | ) |
Contract payable | |
| (16,906 | ) | |
| - | |
Stipulated agreement liability, related party | |
| (12,500 | ) | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net cash used in operating activities | |
| (200,059 | ) | |
| (270,960 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash flows from investing activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Advances to related party shareholder | |
| (163,425 | ) | |
| (128,951 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net cash used in investing activities | |
| (163,425 | ) | |
| (128,951 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash flows from financing activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debt | |
| 500,000 | | |
| - | |
Advances from related party shareholders | |
| - | | |
| (49,993 | ) |
Common stock subscribed | |
| - | | |
| 450,000 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | |
| 500,000 | | |
| 400,007 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net increase in cash | |
| 136,516 | | |
| 96 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash, beginning of year | |
| 79 | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash, end of period | |
$ | 136,595 | | |
$ | 96 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Supplemental Information: | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash paid for: | |
| | | |
| | |
Taxes | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | |
Interest Expense | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | |
Non-cash investing and financing activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Warrants issued with convertible debt | |
$ | 298,989 | | |
$ | - | |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
JAMESON
STANFORD RESOURCES CORPORATION
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE
1 – ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS
On
October 29, 2012, Jameson Stanford Resources Corporation (the “Company”) merged with Bolcán Mining Corporation
(Note 2). Prior to the Merger, the Company was a publically traded shell company with no business operations. The shell company
was originally incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada in June 2009 as MyOtherCountryClub.com for the purpose of developing
a website that would offer reciprocal golf privileges, and other related services, to members of private country clubs throughout
the United States. As a result of the Merger, the Company is no longer considered a shell company.
The
current operating activities of the Company include exploration and pre-extraction activities related to certain mining claims,
mineral leases and excavation rights (collectively referred to herein as “mineral rights”) for mining projects located
in (a) Star Mining District in Beaver County, Utah, (b) Spor Mountain Mining District in Juab County, Utah, and (c) Ogden Bay
Wildlife Management Area in Weber County, Utah. We have not established proven or probable reserves, as defined by the SEC under
Industry Guide 7, through the completion of a “final” or “bankable” feasibility study for our mineral
rights. Furthermore, we have no plans to establish proven or probable reserves for any of our mineral rights.
NOTE
2 – GOING CONCERN
The
financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes the Company will be able to realize its assets
and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. The Company has incurred losses since
inception resulting in a deficit accumulated during exploration stage of $4,422,810 as of the period ended March 31, 2014. Further
losses are anticipated in the development of its business.
The
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company generating profitable operations and cash
flows in the near-term future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising
from normal business operations. Management plans to finance the Company’s operating costs as necessary over the next twelve
months with advances from owners and directors, and the private placement of the Company’s equity ownership. If management
is unsuccessful in these efforts, discontinuance of operations is possible. The financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
JAMESON
STANFORD RESOURCES CORPORATION
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE
3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis
of Accounting and Presentation
The
interim financial information of the Company as of period ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013 is unaudited. The balance sheet
as of December 31, 2013 is derived from audited financial statements. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial statements. Accordingly, they omit or condense
footnotes and certain other information normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. The accounting policies followed for quarterly financial reporting conform to the accounting policies disclosed
in ASU 2014-10. In the opinion of management, all adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial information
for the interim periods reported have been made. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations
for the three months ended March 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the entire year
ending December 31, 2014. The unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the
notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013.
NOTE
4 – MINERAL RIGHTS
At
March 31, 2014, the Company had certain mining claims, mineral leases and excavation rights for mining projects located in (a)
Star Mining District in Beaver County, Utah, (b) Spor Mountain Mining District in Juab County, Utah, and (c) Ogden Bay Wildlife
Management Area in Weber County, Utah. These mineral rights were acquired through staking and purchase, lease or option agreements
and are subject to varying royalty interests, some of which are indexed to the sale price of minerals excavated from these properties.
The Company has not established proven or probable reserves on any of its mineral projects and no minerals have been extracted
from these properties as of March 31, 2014. As of March 31, 2014, mineral rights are $25,869.
NOTE
5 – TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTY
At
the period ended March 31, 2014, the majority owner owed to the Company $1,426,261 as a result of personal use of Company assets.
On
August 20, 2014 the Company filed a complaint against Michael Stanford, its former sole director, CEO and largest shareholder
based upon the alleged wrongful, fraudulent and tortuous acts involving the Company. The financial statements do not reflect,
however, any claims or recovery the Company has realized from this lawsuit against Mr. Stanford as a result of his improper conduct
except as outlined in Note 13 – Subsequent Events – Michael Stanford Litigation.
note
6 – stipulated Agreement LIABILITY, RELATED PARTY
The
Company entered into an agreement with Michael Christiansen, an former officer of the Company (“Christiansen”) on
August 13, 2013 (the “Stipulated Agreement”) to pay Christiansen $123,272 (the “Amount Due”) relating
to a promissory note, accrued compensation and out-of-pocket expenses incurred on behalf of the Company. The Amount Due was agreed
to be paid as follows: $10,500 on or before August 15, 2013; $10,500 on or before September 15, 2013; $10,500 on or before October
15, 2013; and the balance in installments of $15,000 beginning on the earlier of (a) the first day of the month following the
date on which the company received at least three million dollars ($3,000,000) of equity funding, or (b) December 31, 2014. The
Company has the right to prepay any part of this amount without any prepayment penalty. In no event, however, shall the balance
due be paid later than December 31, 2014. In the event of a change of control, the Company is obligated to pay in full the portion
of the Amount Due that remains unpaid. Subject to completion of the payments due under the agreement, the parties agreed to release
certain claims against each other related to or arising in connection with the matters that gave rise to our agreement to pay
the Amount Due. During the period ended March 31, 2014, the Company made payments of $12,500 resulting in a remaining liability
of $79,272 recorded as Stipulated Agreement Liability, Related Party in the accompanying financial statements.
JAMESON
STANFORD RESOURCES CORPORATION
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE
7 – LOAN PAYABLE
On
May 11, 2012, Christiansen loaned the Company $42,000. The loan was guaranteed by the Majority Owner, called for interest at 12%
per annum and was extended to a due date of August 24, 2012. Effective July 1, 2013, the entire balance of $48,598, including
accrued interest of $6,598, was incorporated into the Stipulated Agreement settlement with Christiansen and is included in the
Amount Due. See NOTE 7.
NOTE
8 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES
On
August 19, 2013 the Company issued a $500,000 convertible promissory note (the “Note”) and warrants to purchase shares
of common stock to an individual investor. The overall terms of the Note are as follows:
|
● |
Interest
rate: 12% per annum. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Due
date: September 14, 2015. The Company is to pay the principal amount and all accrued and unpaid interest on or before the
due date. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Redemption
right: Any time the closing price of the Company’s common stock has been at or above $2.00 for 20 consecutive trading
days, the Company has the right to redeem all or any part of the principal and accrued interest of the Note, following written
notice to the holder of the Note. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Optional
Conversion: At the option of the holder, the Note may be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion
price equal to $0.50 per share. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Additionally,
if the Company elects to exercise the redemption right, the holder has the opportunity to elect to take the cash payment or
to convert all or any portion of the Note into shares of the Company’s common stock. |
|
|
|
|
● |
The
conversion price is subject to proportional adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends and similar corporate
events. |
|
|
|
|
● |
The
Note is senior in rank to any other debt held by our officers, directors or affiliates and may not be subordinated to any
other debt issued by us without the written consent of the holder. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Warrants:
The holder of the Note is granted the right through September 30, 2015 to purchase 500,000 additional shares of common stock
at $1.00 per share. |
|
|
|
|
● |
The
Note is secured by all of the mineral ownership and mining rights held by the Company in the Star Mountain Mining District
and proceeds and distributions from such assets. |
|
|
|
|
● |
The
Note is secured by all of the mineral ownership and mining rights held by the Company in the Star Mountain Mining District
and proceeds and distributions from such assets. The Note ranks pari passu in right of payment with the other convertible
promissory notes executed under the offering. |
JAMESON
STANFORD RESOURCES CORPORATION
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
● |
During
the time that any portion of this Note is outstanding, if any Event of Default occurs and such Default is not cured by the
Company within sixty (60) days of the occurrence of the Event of Default (the “Cure Period”), the amount equal
to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the outstanding principal amount of this Note, together with accrued interest and other
amounts owing shall become at the holder’s election, immediately due and payable in cash. The holder at its option has
the right, with three (3) business days advance written notice to the Company after the expiration of the Cure Period, to
elect to convert the Note into shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Optional Conversion rights disclosed
above. |
|
|
|
|
● |
The
Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets report the following related to the convertible promissory note: |
| |
March 31, 2014 | |
Principal amount | |
$ | 500,000 | |
Unamortized debt discount | |
| (317,747 | ) |
Net carrying amount | |
$ | 182,253 | |
For
the period ended March 31, 2014, the Company recorded $15,000 of accrued interest expense for the contractual interest related
to the convertible promissory note and additional interest expense of $53,193 as amortization of the debt discount. At March 31,
2014, none of the debt had been converted and no warrants to purchase common stock had been exercised.
Under
the guidance of ASC 470-20 Debt With Conversion and Other Options, the Company recorded the value of the above warrants to purchase
500,000 shares of its common stock.
Using
the Black-Scholes method, such warrants were valued at $160,138. The following weighted-average assumptions were used in the Black-Scholes
calculation:
| |
March 31, 2014 | |
Expected term (years) | |
| 2.1 | |
Expected volatility | |
| 125.5 | % |
Risk-free interest rate | |
| 0.36 | % |
Dividend yield | |
| 0 | % |
On
December 30, 2013, an amendment to the original note agreement was signed that retroactively eliminated the variability in conversion
terms and the related derivative liability.
On
October 18, 2013 the Company issued another $500,000 convertible promissory note (the “Note”) and warrants to purchase
shares of common stock to an second individual investor. The overall terms of the Note are as follows:
|
● |
Interest
rate: 12% per annum. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Due
date: October 31, 2015. The Company is to pay the principal amount and all accrued and unpaid interest on or before the due
date. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Redemption
right: Any time the closing price of the Company’s common stock has been at or above $2.00 for 20 consecutive trading
days, the Company has the right to redeem all or any part of the principal and accrued interest of the Note, following written
notice to the holder of the Note. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Optional
Conversion: At the option of the holder, the Note may be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion
price equal to $0.50 per share. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Additionally,
if the Company elects to exercise the redemption right, the holder has the opportunity to elect to take the cash payment or
to convert all or any portion of the Note into shares of the Company’s common stock. |
JAMESON
STANFORD RESOURCES CORPORATION
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
● |
The
conversion price is subject to proportional adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends and similar corporate
events. |
|
|
|
|
● |
The
Note is senior in rank to any other debt held by our officers, directors or affiliates and may not be subordinated to any
other debt issued by us without the written consent of the holder. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Warrants:
The holder of the Note is granted the right through September 30, 2015 to purchase 500,000 additional shares of common stock
at $1.00 per share. |
|
|
|
|
● |
The
Note is secured by all of the mineral ownership and mining rights held by the Company in the Star Mountain Mining District
and proceeds and distributions from such assets. The Note ranks pari passu in right of payment with the other convertible
promissory notes executed under the offering. |
|
|
|
|
● |
During
the time that any portion of this Note is outstanding, if any Event of Default occurs and such Default is not cured by the
Company within sixty (60) days of the occurrence of the Event of Default (the “Cure Period”), the amount equal
to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the outstanding principal amount of this Note, together with accrued interest and other
amounts owing shall become at the holder’s election, immediately due and payable in cash. The holder at its option has
the right, with three (3) business days advance written notice to the Company after the expiration of the Cure Period, to
elect to convert the Note into shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Optional Conversion rights disclosed
above. |
|
|
|
|
● |
The
Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets report the following related to the convertible promissory note: |
| |
March
31, 2014 | |
Principal amount | |
$ | 500,000 | |
Unamortized debt
discount | |
| (389,637 | ) |
Net carrying amount | |
$ | 110,363 | |
For
the period ended March 31, 2014, the Company recorded $15,000 of accrued interest expense for the contractual interest related
to the convertible promissory note and additional interest expense of $60,565 as amortization of the debt discount. At March 31,
2014, none of the debt had been converted and no warrants to purchase common stock had been exercised.
Under
the guidance of ASC 470-20 Debt With Conversion and Other Options, the Company recorded the value of the above warrants to purchase
500,000 shares of its common stock.
Using
the Black-Scholes method, such warrants were valued at $209,503. The following weighted-average assumptions were used in the Black-Scholes
calculation:
| |
March
31, 2014 | |
Expected term (years) | |
| 2.0 | |
Expected volatility | |
| 125.5 | % |
Risk-free interest rate | |
| 0.33 | % |
Dividend yield | |
| 0 | % |
On
January 22, 2014 the Company issued a $200,000 convertible promissory note (the “Note”) and warrants to purchase shares
of common stock to an individual investor. The overall terms of the Note are as follows:
|
● |
Interest
rate: 12% per annum |
|
|
|
|
● |
Due
date: October 15, 2015. The Company is to pay the principal amount and all accrued and unpaid interest on or before the due
date. |
JAMESON
STANFORD RESOURCES CORPORATION
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
● |
Redemption
right: Any time the closing price of the Company’s common stock has been at or above $2.00 for 20 consecutive trading
days, the Company has the right to redeem all or any part of the principal and accrued interest of the Note, following written
notice to the holder of the Note. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Optional
Conversion: At the option of the holder, the Note may be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion
price equal to $0.50 per share. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Additionally,
if the Company elects to exercise the redemption right, the holder has the opportunity to elect to take the cash payment or
to convert all or any portion of the Note into shares of the Company’s common stock. |
|
|
|
|
● |
The
conversion price is subject to proportional adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends and similar corporate
events. |
|
|
|
|
● |
The
Note is senior in rank to any other debt held by our officers, directors or affiliates and may not be subordinated to any
other debt issued by us without the written consent of the holder. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Warrants:
The holder of the Note is granted the right through October 15, 2015 to purchase 200,000 additional shares of common stock
at $1.00 per share. |
|
|
|
|
● |
The
Note is secured by all of the mineral ownership and mining rights held by the Company in the Star Mountain Mining District
and proceeds and distributions from such assets. |
|
|
|
|
● |
The
Note is secured by all of the mineral ownership and mining rights held by the Company in the Star Mountain Mining District
and proceeds and distributions from such assets. The Note ranks pari passu in right of payment with the other convertible
promissory notes executed under the offering. |
|
|
|
|
● |
During
the time that any portion of this Note is outstanding, if any Event of Default occurs and such Default is not cured by the
Company within sixty (60) days of the occurrence of the Event of Default (the “Cure Period”), the amount equal
to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the outstanding principal amount of this Note, together with accrued interest and other
amounts owing shall become at the holder’s election, immediately due and payable in cash. The holder at its option has
the right, with three (3) business days advance written notice to the Company after the expiration of the Cure Period, to
elect to convert the Note into shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Optional Conversion rights disclosed
above. |
|
|
|
|
● |
The
Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets report the following related to the convertible promissory note: |
| |
March
31, 2014 | |
Principal amount | |
$ | 200,000 | |
Unamortized debt discount | |
| (40,975 | ) |
Net carrying amount | |
$ | 159,025 | |
For
the period ended March 31, 2014, the Company recorded $4,667 of accrued interest expense for the contractual interest related
to the convertible promissory note and additional interest expense of $4,949 as amortization of the debt discount. At the period
ended March 31, 2014, none of the debt had been converted and no warrants to purchase common stock had been exercised.
Under
the guidance of ASC 470-20 Debt With Conversion and Other Options, the Company recorded the value of the above warrants to purchase
200,000 shares of its common stock.
Using
the Black-Scholes method, such warrants were valued at $45,924. The following weighted-average assumptions were used in the Black-Scholes
calculation:
| |
March
31, 2014 | |
Expected term (years) | |
| 1.7 | |
Expected volatility | |
| 159.3 | % |
Risk-free interest rate | |
| 0.44 | % |
Dividend yield | |
| 0 | % |
JAMESON
STANFORD RESOURCES CORPORATION
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On
March 12, 2014 the Company issued a $300,000 convertible promissory note (the “Note”) and warrants to purchase shares
of common stock to a second individual investor. The overall terms of the Note are as follows:
|
● |
Interest
rate: 12% per annum. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Due
date: October 15, 2015. The Company is to pay the principal amount and all accrued and unpaid interest on or before the due
date. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Redemption
right: Any time the closing price of the Company’s common stock has been at or above $2.00 for 20 consecutive trading
days, the Company has the right to redeem all or any part of the principal and accrued interest of the Note, following written
notice to the holder of the Note. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Optional
Conversion: At the option of the holder, the Note may be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion
price equal to $0.50 per share. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Additionally,
if the Company elects to exercise the redemption right, the holder has the opportunity to elect to take the cash payment or
to convert all or any portion of the Note into shares of the Company’s common stock. |
|
|
|
|
● |
The
conversion price is subject to proportional adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends and similar corporate
events. |
|
|
|
|
● |
The
Note is senior in rank to any other debt held by our officers, directors or affiliates and may not be subordinated to any
other debt issued by us without the written consent of the holder. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Warrants:
The holder of the Note is granted the right through October 15, 2015 to purchase 300,000 additional shares of common stock
at $1.00 per share. |
|
|
|
|
● |
The
Note is secured by all of the mineral ownership and mining rights held by the Company in the Star Mountain Mining District
and proceeds and distributions from such assets. The Note ranks pari passu in right of payment with the other convertible
promissory notes executed under the offering. |
|
|
|
|
● |
During
the time that any portion of this Note is outstanding, if any Event of Default occurs and such Default is not cured by the
Company within sixty (60) days of the occurrence of the Event of Default (the “Cure Period”), the amount equal
to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the outstanding principal amount of this Note, together with accrued interest and other
amounts owing shall become at the holder’s election, immediately due and payable in cash. The holder at its option has
the right, with three (3) business days advance written notice to the Company after the expiration of the Cure Period, to
elect to convert the Note into shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Optional Conversion rights disclosed
above. |
|
|
|
|
● |
The
Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets report the following related to the convertible promissory note: |
| |
March
31, 2014 | |
Principal amount | |
$ | 300,000 | |
Unamortized debt discount | |
| (244,804 | ) |
Net carrying amount | |
$ | 55,196 | |
For
the period ended March 31, 2014, the Company recorded $1,800 of accrued interest expense for the contractual interest related
to the convertible promissory note and additional interest expense of $8,262 as amortization of the debt discount. At the period
ended March 31, 2014, none of the debt had been converted and no warrants to purchase common stock had been exercised.
Under
the guidance of ASC 470-20 Debt With Conversion and Other Options, the Company recorded the value of the above warrants to purchase
300,000 shares of its common stock.
Using
the Black-Scholes method, such warrants were valued at $253,066. The following weighted-average assumptions were used in the Black-Scholes
calculation:
JAMESON
STANFORD RESOURCES CORPORATION
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| |
March 31, 2014 | |
Expected term (years) | |
| 1.6 | |
Expected volatility | |
| 177.0 | % |
Risk-free interest rate | |
| 0.37 | % |
Dividend yield | |
| 0 | % |
Aggregate
maturities of Convertible Notes in each of the next five years ending December 31st are as follows:
2014 | |
$ | - | |
2015 | |
| 1,500,000 | |
2016 | |
| - | |
2017 | |
| - | |
2018 | |
| - | |
| |
$ | 1,500,000 | |
The
January 22, 2014 and March 12, 2014 Notes and the Pledge and Security Agreements and Subscription Agreements entered into by the
Company and the investors in connection with the issuance of the respective Notes are substantially identical in form to the Notes,
Pledge and Security Agreements and Subscription Agreements entered into between the Company and the investors in the August 19,
2013 and October 18, 2013 issuances discussed above.
NOTE
9 – CONTRACTS AND LEASE COMMITMENTS
Office
Leases
Commencing
February 1, 2013 and continuing to January 31, 2014, the Company rented residential office space from an entity controlled by
the Majority Owner. The monthly lease payment is comparable to rents paid by non-related parties for similar office space in the
area.
Commencing
October 1, 2013 and continuing to March 31, 2014, the Company leased executive office space totaling 430 square feet. The Company
is obligated to monthly lease payment of $5,300. The agreement is renewable at the option of the Company in three month increments.
The current lease expires June 30, 2014. The Company was required to submit a refundable deposit of $5,100. The refundable
deposit was returned in the second quarter of 2014.
Service
Contracts
Effective
July 31, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement with Christiansen to serve as Executive Vice President, Corporate Development.
The initial term of six months calls for monthly compensation of $6,000 increasing to $10,000 per month once the company has raised
$1,000,000 in new equity funding, $15,000 per month once the company has raised $3,000,000 and $20,000 per month once the company
has raised $5,000,000. The Company is further obligated to reimburse Christiansen for usual and customary business related expenses.
This contract was not renewed and expired on January 31, 2014.
Royalty
Agreement
Under
a memorandum of understanding, the Company is obligated to pay an existing investor, a royalty equal to $.50 per metric tonne
(approx 2,200 lbs) for any sales of ore until the investor has recouped his investment of $750,000. No royalty expense has been
incurred or recorded related to this agreement for the period ended March 31, 2014. See Note 13 – Subsequent Events –
Share Cancellation
NOTE
10 – EQUITY TRANSACTION
On
February 27, 2014, the Company issued 650,000 restricted common shares to a professional services company controlled by an officer
of the Company. Based on a closing common share value of $.70 on the issuance date, professional services expense of $455,000
was recorded. See Note 13 – Subsequent Events, Share Cancellation.
In connection with the
Company’s issuance of the $200,000 and $300,000 principal amount of Notes on January 22,
2014 and March 12, 2014, respectively, discussed in Note 9 – Convertible Notes, the Company issued warrants to purchase
an aggregate of 500,000 shares of its common stock at $1.00 per share. The Warrants expire on October 15, 2015. The exercise price
is subject to proportional adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends and similar corporate events.
JAMESON
STANFORD RESOURCES CORPORATION
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE
11 – LEGAL
On
January 16, 2014, DOSECC Exploration Services (“DOSECC”) filed a lien in Beaver County, UT on the Chopar Mine for
an outstanding balance owed in connection with their work in the alleged amount of seventy thousand dollars ($70,000). In August,
2014, DOSECC filed a lawsuit in Utah Fifth District Court for the allegedly delinquent balance and are reportedly in a position
to seek a default judgment and foreclosure on the Chopar Mine. However, the foreclosure and the DOSECC lawsuit have been temporarily
delayed until the Court-ordered accounting with Michael Stanford is completed. See Note 13 – Subsequent Events, Michael
Stanford Litigation. The alleged amount noted above is reflected in the financial statements as a liability.
NOTE
12 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Michael
Stanford Litigation
On
August 20, 2014 the Company filed a complaint in the Fifth Judicial District Court, Beaver Count, Utah (Civil Case No. 140500023)
against Michael Stanford, its former sole director, CEO and its largest shareholder based upon the alleged wrongful, fraudulent
and tortuous acts whereby Mr. Stanford committed the pervasive, profound, continuous, repeated, and ongoing wrongful and fraudulent
acts and omissions resulting in at least $2,591,359 in losses for the Company, $1,272,321 in fraudulent claimed business expenses,
$1,319,038 representing investment monies diverted from the Company and monies deposited directly into Mr. Stanford’s personal
accounts and the improper issuance to Mr. Stanford of 25,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for the
stock of Bolcán Mining Corporation in May 2012 whose assets were highly inflated at the time the Company completed this
acquisition. The complaint also alleges that Mr. Stanford misappropriated for his own personal uses $750,000 of investment capital
that was to be invested in the Company, the failure to disclose his history of litigation, his general fraudulent conduct in dealing
with the Company and threats of violence against the Company’s officers and other persons related to the Company.
Based
on this conduct, the complaint includes a claim for an accounting, conversion, fraudulent misrepresentation and fraudulent nondisclosure,
interference with present and prospective economic relations, declaratory judgment, and injunctive relief. The complaint seeks,
among other things, monetary damages of $5,873,675, injunctive relief and punitive damages, cancellation of 25,000,000 shares
of the Company’s common stock and the Company’s costs, expenses and attorney’s fees associated with the this
lawsuit.
On
May 27, 2014, Mr. Stanford resigned as an officer and director of the Company. Our current management had no knowledge of Mr.
Stanford’s improper conduct as alleged in the complaint which relate to his actions prior to his resignation.
JAMESON
STANFORD RESOURCES CORPORATION
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On
September 22, 2014 the Company received notice that a Default Judgment and Order Granting Default Judgment and Relief (the “Judgment”)
had been issued by the Fifth Judicial District Court, Beaver County, Utah in the Company’s complaint in Civil Case No. 140500023
filed against Michael Stanford, its former sole director, CEO and its former largest shareholder.
The
Judgment requires, among other things, that Mr. Stanford render a full accounting to the Company, orders the return of 25,000,000
shares of Company common stock, and the transfer of a residential property located at 510 West Center, Milford, Utah 84751 to
the Company, as well as transfers ownership of all the personal property located within the real property to the Company. The
Judgment also enjoins Mr. Stanford from representing that he is involved in the business of the Company or its subsidiaries to
any person or entity, as well as permanently enjoining Mr. Stanford from offering or pretending to offer for sale any stock or
security interest in the Company or its affiliated entities. The injunction further prohibits Mr. Stanford from offering or pretending
to offer for sale any actual or fabricated business opportunity related in any way to the Company or an affiliate of the Company.
The Judgment permanently enjoins Mr. Stanford from wasting, concealing, withholding, transferring, transmitting, or transporting
across any state boundary any asset, corporate opportunity, record, or title to which the Company is entitled and/or that has
been purchased or produced in whole or in part through use of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company.
The
Judgment further enjoins Mr. Stanford from, among other things, and with the a limited exception of communications made during
settlement negotiations, communicating with, threatening, assaulting, bribing any past or present officer, employee, agent, investor,
or representative of the Company or its subsidiaries, tampering with or destroying records and property relating to Judgment.
The Judgment forbids Mr. Stanford from leaving the State of Utah, and also from leaving the United States, and orders Mr. Stanford
to surrender his passport to the Court, until such time as Mr. Stanford shall render an accounting to the Company to the satisfaction
of the Court.
The
Judgment also orders Mr. Stanford to pay the Company’s costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees associated with the Stanford
Lawsuit, as well as past, present, and future accrual and proximate damages suffered due to the loss and harm caused by Mr. Stanford’s
acts and omissions in relation to the Stanford Lawsuit in the amount of $5,873,675. The court further ordered punitive damages
against Mr. Stanford in the amount of treble the current known actual damages (other than the retitled securities and the Milford,
Utah residential property), for a total of $17,621,025, and post-judgment interest. The Judgment is without prejudice to any future
suit the Company or any other entity or investor may have for additional, non-duplicative damages and relief that may be revealed
as necessary through any further audits and rendering of an accounting that may occur in connection the Mr. Stanford.
On
September 17, 2014, prior to the entering of the Judgment, Mr. Stanford conveyed to the Company the real property located at 510
West Center, Milford, Utah 84751 and executed an irrevocable stock power of attorney to convey 25,000,000 shares of our common
stock that he owned for cancellation by the Company. The 25,000,000 shares of common stock were cancelled on September 22, 2014.
We are evaluating what future legal proceedings we may pursue in order to collect money damages of $23,494,700 awarded to us pursuant
to the Judgment.
The
Company believes that its claims in the above case are substantial for the reasons discussed above. Litigation is, however, inherently
unpredictable. The final outcome of this lawsuit is subject to significant uncertainties and, therefore, determining the likelihood
of a recovery and/or the measurement of any recovery is complex. Consequently, we are unable to estimate the range of reasonably
possible recovery. Our assessment is based on an estimate and assumption that has been deemed reasonable by management, but the
assessment process relies heavily on an estimate and assumption that may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated
events and circumstances may occur that might cause us to change that estimate and assumption.
JAMESON
STANFORD RESOURCES CORPORATION
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Share
Cancellation
On
October 1, 2014, but effective September 18, 2014, a shareholder signed an Agreement of Mutual Understanding and Settlement wherein
the shareholder agrees to:
| 1. | Cancel
a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) wherein it was purported
to contract for the purchase of common shares of the Company and grant a certain Royalty
(the “Royalty”) |
| | |
| 2. | Return
3,860,000 shares of common stock resulting in the shareholder having 1,500,000 shares
at $.50 per share for the $750,000 previously invested. The shares were cancelled on
October 1, 2014. |
| | |
| 3. | Surrender
all rights to the Royalty in the original MOU |
On
September 25, 2014, the former Chief Financial Officer of the Company signed a Mutual Release, Non-Disparagement, Stock Cancellation
and Non-Solicitation Agreement wherein he agreed to return 500,000 shares of our common stock that he owns for cancellation by
the Company and agreed to cancel the amount payable to his company for accounting and financial consulting work in the amount
of $13,716. The shares were cancelled on October 9, 2014.
Debt
and Warrant Conversion
On
October 22, 2014, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors and another Director agreed to convert $1,500,000
aggregate principal of the Company’s convertible debt previously issued to them (the “Convertible Debt”) along
with accrued interest of $175,433 into an aggregate of 3,350,867 shares of the Company’s unregistered common stock (the
“Conversion”). In connection with the Conversion, the Company entered into an Amendment to Common Stock Purchase Warrants
related to warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Warrants”).
The Warrants were issued to them in connection with the issuance of the Convertible Debt (the “Warrant Amendment”).
The Warrant Amendment reduces the Exercise Price of all unexercised Warrants from $1.00 per share to $0.50 per share. The Warrants
were exercised pursuant to its cashless exercise provisions. An additional 750,000 shares of the Company’s unregistered
common stock will be issued for the warrants. The total number of shares of 4,100,867 were issued on October 30, 2014.
The
Company has evaluated subsequent events pursuant to ASC 855. Other than the events noted above, no additional material subsequent
events exist.
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
THE
COMPANY
Overview
We
are a minerals exploration company focused on acquiring and consolidating mining claims, mineral leases and excavation rights
(collectively referred to herein as “mineral rights”). We are currently engaged in exploration and pre-extraction
activities for mineral rights for mining projects located in (a) Star Mining District in Beaver County, Utah, (b) Spor Mountain
Mining District in Juab County, Utah, and (c) Ogden Bay Wildlife Management Area in Weber County, Utah discussed below. We have
not established proven or probable reserves, as defined by the SEC under Industry Guide 7, through the completion of a “final”
or “bankable” feasibility study for our mineral rights. Furthermore, we have no plans to establish proven or probable
reserves for any of our mineral rights.
History
We
were originally incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada in June 2009 as MyOtherCountryClub.com for the purpose of developing
a website that would offer reciprocal golf privileges, and other related services, to members of private country clubs throughout
the United States.
On
May 7, 2012, we entered into an Acquisition Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended on July 24, 2012 and on October 24, 2012
(collectively referred to as the “Merger Agreement”), with our wholly-owned subsidiary, JSR Sub Co, a Nevada corporation
(“Sub Co”), and Bolcán Mining Corporation, a Nevada corporation (“Bolcán Mining”). Pursuant
to the Merger Agreement, we issued 25,000,000 shares of our Rule 144 restricted common stock in exchange for 100% of Bolcán
Mining’s issued and outstanding capital stock.
On
May 2, 2012, we completed a 7-for-1 forward split of all outstanding shares of our common stock and a corresponding increase in
our authorized common stock. The effect of the forward split was to increase the number of our common shares issued and outstanding
from 8,400,000 to 58,800,000 and to increase our authorized common shares from 50,000,000 shares, par value $0.001, to 350,000,000
shares, par value $0.001.
Pursuant
to the terms of the Merger Agreement, on October 29, 2012 Sub Co merged with and into Bolcán Mining (the “Merger”)
with Bolcán Mining surviving the Merger as our wholly owned subsidiary. After the Merger, there were 31,300,000 shares
of our common stock outstanding, of which approximately 80% were held by the former shareholders of Bolcán Mining. Prior
to the Merger, we were a shell company with no business operations. As a result of the Merger, we are no longer considered a shell
company.
Michael
Stanford Litigation
On
August 20, 2014 the Company filed a complaint against Michael Stanford, its former sole director, CEO and largest shareholder
based upon the alleged wrongful, fraudulent and tortious acts involving the Company. The financial statements do not reflect,
however, any claims or recovery the Company has realized from a lawsuit the Company filed against Mr. Stanford as a result of
his improper conduct except as outlined in Part II, Item 1. Legal Proceedings – Michael Stanford Litigation.
Description
of Bolcán Mining Corporation’s Business
Bolcán
Mining was incorporated on April 11, 2012 to pursue the exploration of certain mining claims, mineral leases and excavation rights
for mining projects located in (a) Star Mining District in Beaver County, Utah, (b) Spor Mountain Mining District in Juab County,
Utah, and (c) Ogden Bay Wildlife Management Area in Weber County, Utah. On April 23, 2012, Bolcán Mining acquired certain
lode mining claims and mineral leases related to the Star Mining District and Spor Mountain Mining District projects.
Effective
as of June 30, 2012, pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement between Bolcán Mining and the Bolcán Group LLC (“Bolcán
Group”) which was formed in October 12, 2010 by Mr. Stanford, Bolcán Mining purchased all of the assets and assumed
certain liabilities of the Bolcán Group resulting in a combination of the two companies.
The
operating activities of the Bolcán Group were inconsequential until October 2011 and consisted primarily of historical
site research performed by Mr. Stanford. Mr. Stanford has other mining interests and provides services to the mining industry
that are not part of Bolcán Mining.
Projects
Our
current active projects include:
Star
Mountain (Star Mining District) - The Star Mountain/Chopar Mine project consists of 116 lode-mining claims and four metalliferous
mineral lease sections located in the Star Mountain range, Star Mining District, in Beaver County, Utah, approximately five miles
west of Milford, Utah. One of the 117 lode-mining claims previously disclosed was administratively disallowed by the Utah Division
of the Federal Bureau of Land Management in August 2014. The Star Mountain project involves total area of 2,320 acres. As of the
date of this Report, the Company has conducted geological analysis, magnetometry studies, and a limited reverse circulation and
core drilling exploration program led by our former CEO. Subsequent to our former CEO’s departure from the Company
in late May 2014, the Company retained an independent geologist and geophysicist firm to undertake a review of the Star Mountain/Chopar
project. Based on their preliminary results, the Company has elected to engage in further substantive drilling, sampling
and geophysical reviews in order to ascertain the nature and extent of the inferred mineralization that appears to exist in this
area. At this stage of exploration, the Company cannot state that it has proven or probable reserves, nor can it assure
investors that such proven or probable reserves will ever be proven to exist in the project area. In October 2014, the Company’s
third-party geology and geophysical consultants will be commencing further on-site work in order to provide the data necessary
to compile a pre-feasibility study of our mineral rights in the project area. We expect to receive the results of such study
in late 2014 or early 2015.
Spor
Mountain (Spor Mountain Mining District) - The Spor Mountain project consists of nine mining claims and three metalifferous
mineral lease sections located in Juab County, Utah. The Company’s Spor Mountain/Dugway Minerals project involves
a total area of 2,098 acres. Based on the Company’s preliminary geological analysis and two prospect pit excavations, it
is estimated that total inferred reserves at the Dugway Minerals site may ultimately involve more than 4,000,000 ounces of silver,
commercial concentrations of beryllium and other precious and base metals. The Company’s inferred reserve calculations
have not established proven or probable reserves, as defined by the SEC under Industry Guide 7, through the completion of a “final”
or “bankable” feasibility study for our mineral and excavation rights. Furthermore, at the present time, we have not
established a program of further exploration and engineering to establish proven or probable reserves for any of our mineral rights
at the Spor Mountain project, and, as such, investors are cautioned that inferred reserve calculations may not be indicative of
an economically recoverable resource.
Ogden
Bay Minerals - Ogden Bay Minerals is a developing mineral excavation project on federal protected wetlands, canals and river
systems across 25 square miles of land area known as North Delta, located in West Ogden, Utah. The Company was commissioned by
the State of Utah Division of Natural Resources, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service and Weber County Emergency Management
to restore habitat, repair damage, dredge silt and sand and remove debris from the Weber River. Our excavation and harvesting
rights are maintained through easement rights obtained from Weber County and a special use river/stream alteration permit as part
of a State of Utah/Weber County flood mitigation project. The project contains deposits of alluvial mineral deposits that are
created and replenished from 125 miles of river flow from the nearby Wasatch Mountain Range. These alluvial mineral deposits
appear to have commercial grades of zircon, usable silica, and other heavy mineral ore. The economic feasibility of processing
the alluvial material to extract the mineralization has not yet been determined and significant testing will be required in order
to determine if such processing is economically warranted. The Company intends to commence further assaying and engineering
studies in the second quarter of 2015 to determine the economic feasibility of proceeding with the Ogden Bay Minerals project.
Products
Subject
to satisfactory engineering and geophysical results as discussed above and access to sufficient capital, we intend to develop
our project mining claims, mineral leases and excavation rights to produce the following specialized mining products:
|
● |
Copper
Ore with Precious Metals Component - Hard rock mineralized material will be drilled, blasted, excavated and hauled, then crushed
and classified to customer specifications. We will deliver this product on-demand or just in time to customers on a 24/7 schedule,
utilizing truck and pup combos for local deliveries, and rail for regional deliveries. The Union Pacific Railroad main line
from Los Angeles to Ogden, Utah, is routed through Milford, Utah, approximately five miles east of our Star Mountain project
site. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Mined
Mineral Concentrates - Finely divided particles from hard rock mining and recovery operations containing significant enrichments
of silver and gold will be upgraded by gravity concentrating methods to contain a minimum 3,000 grams of precious metals per
ton of concentrate. Mineral concentrate products are dried, bagged, and shipped to customers. |
Results
of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in
this Quarterly Report.
Revenue.
No revenue was generated for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the three months ended March 31, 2013.
Cost
of revenue. The cost of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the three months ended March 31, 2013 was zero.
Operating
Expenses. Operating expenses were $576,882 and $327,816 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013, respectively.
The increase is due to increased costs for accounting services.
Operating
Loss. The operating loss was $576,882 and $327,816 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013, respectively.
The increase is due to increased costs for accounting services.
Interest
Expense. Interest expense, including interest expense–related parties and amortization of debt discount, was $164,693
and $7,351 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013, respectively. The increase was due to convertible notes.
Net
Loss. Our net loss was $741,575 and $335,167 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013, respectively. The
increase in net loss was a result of the increases in operating and interest expense discussed above.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Liquidity
is the ability of an enterprise to generate adequate amounts of cash to meet its needs for cash requirements. The Company had
cash of $136,595 and $79 as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
At
March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, current liabilities exceeded current assets creating negative working capital balances of
$321,771 and $503,809 respectively.
Net
cash used in operating activities was $200,059 and $270,960 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013, respectively.
Net
cash provided by financing activities was $500,000 and $400,007 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013,
respectively. The Company had total assets at March 31, 2014 of $1,728,459.
Cash
Requirements
We
do not have sufficient liquidity to satisfy our cash requirements for the next twelve months which will require us to raise additional
equity and /or debt capital in order to implement our business strategy. We intend to develop a significant capital investment
program to scale our production capacity which will require us to raise additional debt or equity capital. Any issuance of equity
securities will result in dilution to our stockholders. Issuance of debt or convertible securities could also involve substantial
dilution to our stockholders or operational and financial covenants that might inhibit our ability to follow our business plan.
Additional financing may not be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us or at all. If we are unable to obtain additional
financing, we may be required to reduce the scope of, delay or eliminate some or all of our planned exploration activities which
could harm our financial conditions and operating results.
We
do not currently have any contractual restrictions (other than the provisions related to Convertible Notes, see NOTE 9) on our
ability to incur debt and, accordingly, we could incur significant amounts of indebtedness to finance operations. Any such indebtedness
could contain covenants which would restrict our operations.
Related
Party Transactions
At
March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had outstanding stipulated agreement liability with a related party of $79,272 and $91,772,
respectively.
At
the period ended March 31, 2014, the majority shareholder owed to the Company $1,426,261 for personal use of Company assets.
On
August 20, 2014 the Company filed a complaint against Michael Stanford, its former sole director, CEO and largest shareholder
based upon the alleged wrongful, fraudulent and tortuous acts involving the Company. The financial statements do not reflect,
however, any claims or recovery the Company has realized from a lawsuit the Company filed against Mr. Stanford as a result of
his improper conduct except as outlined in Part II, Item 1. Legal Proceedings – Michael Stanford Litigation
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
There
are no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition,
changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources
that is material to investors.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As
a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information under Item 3.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As
required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), we carried out an evaluation
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls as of the end of the period covered by this report,
March 31, 2014. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our president, Joseph Marchal
and our interim chief financial officer, Donna S. Moore, the certifying officers. Based upon that evaluation, our Certifying Officers
concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, March 31, 2014, our disclosure controls and procedures are
ineffective in timely alerting management to material information relating to us and required to be included in our periodic filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”).
Our
certifying officers further concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are ineffective to ensure that information required
to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and are also ineffective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated
to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, to allow time for decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Subsequent
to the filing of our initial Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013, we discovered that as of March 31, 2013, the following
material weaknesses existed:
|
● |
The
Company did not maintain effective controls over the accounting for cash receipts and
disbursements. Specifically the lack of these controls permitted our former Chief Executive
Officer to use cash for certain related party transaction. The Company discovered that
some of these transactions took place without sufficient externally prepared documentation
or approvals. Also, certain aspects of the financial reporting process were materially
deficient because it lacked a sufficient complement of personnel with a level of accounting
expertise and an adequate supervisory review structure that is commensurate with the
Company’s financial reporting requirements. This material weakness resulted in
the Company failing to record the receipt of funds for sales of the Company’s common
stock and the accounting for the use of the proceeds from those sales, the incorrect
classification of personal expenses of our former Chief Executive Officer and majority
shareholder’s personal expenses as expenses of our company resulting in the restatement
of its financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2013. |
We
expect to be materially dependent upon a third party to provide us with accounting consulting services for the foreseeable future.
Until such time as we have a chief financial officer with the requisite expertise in U.S. GAAP, there are no assurances that the
material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting will not result in
errors in our financial statements which could lead to a restatement of those financial statements.
Our
management, including our President and Chief Operating Officer and our Interim Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that
our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter
how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system
are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of
controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of
controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected.
Changes
in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation
of our controls performed during the period ended March 31, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
DOSECC
Lien
On
January 16, 2014, DOSECC Exploration Services (“DOSECC”) filed a lien in Beaver County, UT on the Chopar Mine for
an outstanding balance owed in connection with their work in the alleged amount of seventy thousand dollars ($70,000.00). In August,
2014, DOSECC filed a lawsuit in Utah Fifth District Court for the allegedly delinquent balance and are reportedly in a position
to seek a default judgment and foreclosure on the Chopar Mine. However, the foreclosure and the DOSECC lawsuit have been temporarily
delayed until the Court-ordered accounting with Michael Stanford is completed. See below. The alleged amount noted above is reflected
in the financial statements as a liability.
Michael
Stanford Litigation
On
August 20, 2014 the Company filed a complaint in the Fifth Judicial District Court, Beaver County, Utah (Civil Case No. 140500023)
against Michael Stanford, its former sole director, CEO and its largest shareholder based upon the alleged wrongful, fraudulent
and tortuous acts whereby Mr. Stanford committed the pervasive, profound, continuous, repeated, and ongoing wrongful and fraudulent
acts and omissions resulting in at least $2,591,359 in losses for the Company, $1,272,321 in fraudulent claimed business expenses,
$1,319,038 representing investment monies diverted from the Company and monies deposited directly into Mr. Stanford’s personal
accounts and the improper issuance to Mr. Stanford of 25,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for the
stock of Bolcán Mining Corporation in May 2012 whose assets were highly inflated at the time the Company completed this
acquisition. The complaint also alleges that Mr. Stanford misappropriated for his own personal uses $750,000 of investment capital
that was to be invested in the Company, the failure to disclose his history of litigation, his general fraudulent conduct in dealing
with the Company and threats of violence against the Company’s officers and other persons related to the Company.
Based
on this conduct, the complaint includes a claim for an accounting, conversion, fraudulent misrepresentation and fraudulent nondisclosure,
interference with present and prospective economic relations, declaratory judgment, and injunctive relief. The complaint seeks,
among other things, monetary damages of $5,873,675, injunctive relief and punitive damages, cancellation of 25,000,000 shares
of the Company’s common stock and the Company’s costs, expenses and attorney’s fees associated with the this
lawsuit.
On
May 27, 2014, Mr. Stanford resigned as an officer and director of the Company. Our current management had no knowledge of Mr.
Stanford’s improper conduct as alleged in the complaint which relate to his actions prior to his resignation.
On
September 22, 2014, the Company received notice that a Default Judgment and Order Granting Default Judgment and Relief (the “Judgment”)
had been issued by the Fifth Judicial District Court, Beaver County, Utah in the Company’s complaint in Civil Case No. 140500023
filed against Michael Stanford, its former sole director, CEO and its former largest shareholder.
The
Judgment requires, among other things, that Mr. Stanford render a full accounting to the Company, orders the return of 25,000,000
shares of Company common stock, and the transfer of a residential property located at 510 West Center, Milford, Utah 84751 to
the Company, as well as transfers ownership of all the personal property located within the real property to the Company. The
Judgment also enjoins Mr. Stanford from representing that he is involved in the business of the Company or its subsidiaries to
any person or entity, as well as permanently enjoining Mr. Stanford from offering or pretending to offer for sale any stock or
security interest in the Company or its affiliated entities. The injunction further prohibits Mr. Stanford from offering or pretending
to offer for sale any actual or fabricated business opportunity related in any way to the Company or an affiliate of the Company.
The Judgment permanently enjoins Mr. Stanford from wasting, concealing, withholding, transferring, transmitting, or transporting
across any state boundary any asset, corporate opportunity, record, or title to which the Company is entitled and/or that has
been purchased or produced in whole or in part through use of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company.
The
Judgment further enjoins Mr. Stanford from, among other things, and with the a limited exception of communications made during
settlement negotiations, communicating with, threatening, assaulting, bribing any past or present officer, employee, agent, investor,
or representative of the Company or its subsidiaries, tampering with or destroying records and property relating to Judgment.
The Judgment forbids Mr. Stanford from leaving the State of Utah, and also from leaving the United States, and orders Mr. Stanford
to surrender his passport to the Court, until such time as Mr. Stanford shall render an accounting to the Company to the satisfaction
of the Court.
The
Judgment also orders Mr. Stanford to pay the Company’s costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees associated with the Stanford
Lawsuit, as well as past, present, and future accrual and proximate damages suffered due to the loss and harm caused by Mr. Stanford’s
acts and omissions in relation to the Stanford Lawsuit in the amount of $5,873,675. The court further ordered punitive damages
against Mr. Stanford in the amount of treble the current known actual damages (other than the retitled securities and the Milford,
Utah residential property), for a total of $17,621,025, and post-judgment interest. The Judgment is without prejudice to any future
suit the Company or any other entity or investor may have for additional, non-duplicative damages and relief that may be revealed
as necessary through any further audits and rendering of an accounting that may occur in connection the Mr. Stanford.
On
September 17, 2014, prior to the entering of the Judgment, Mr. Stanford conveyed to the Company the real property located at 510
West Center, Milford, Utah 84751 and executed an irrevocable stock power of attorney to convey 25,000,000 shares of our common
stock that he owned for cancellation by the Company. The 25,000,000 shares of common stock were cancelled on September 22, 2014.
We are evaluating what future legal proceedings we may pursue in order to collect money damages of $23,494,700 awarded to us pursuant
to the Judgment.
The
Company believes that its claims in the above case are substantial for the reasons discussed above. Litigation is, however, inherently
unpredictable. The final outcome of this lawsuit is subject to significant uncertainties and, therefore, determining the likelihood
of a recovery and/or the measurement of any recovery is complex. Consequently, we are unable to estimate the range of reasonably
possible recovery. Our assessment is based on an estimate and assumption that has been deemed reasonable by management, but the
assessment process relies heavily on an estimate and assumption that may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated
events and circumstances may occur that might cause us to change that estimate and assumption.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS.
As
a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide disclosure under this Item 1A.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
On
February 27, 2014, the Company issued 650,000 shares of common stock for professional services valued at $455,000. See Subsequent
Events – Cancellation of Shares.
The
recipients are accredited or otherwise sophisticated investors who had access to business and financial information on the Company.
The issuances were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) in
reliance on an exemption provided by Section 4(a)(2) of that act.
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
None.
ITEM
4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Pursuant
to Section 1503(a) of the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, issuers that are operators,
or that have a subsidiary that is an operator, of a coal or other mine in the United States are required to disclose in their
periodic reports filed with the SEC information regarding specified health and safety violations, orders and citations, related
assessments and legal actions, and mining-related fatalities. At this time, we have no safety violations, orders, citations, related
assessments or legal actions, or mining-related fatalities to report.
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION.
On
January 22, 2014 and March 12, 2014, the Company issued convertible promissory notes in the principal amounts of $200,000 and
$300,000, respectively (the “Notes”) and warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock to an individual
investor. The overall terms of the Notes are as follows:
|
● |
Interest rate: 12%
per annum |
|
|
|
|
● |
Due date: October
15, 2015. The Company is to pay the principal amount and all accrued and unpaid interest on or before the due date. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Redemption right:
Any time the closing price of the Company’s common stock has been at or above $2.00 for 20 consecutive trading days,
the Company has the right to redeem all or any part of the principal and accrued interest of the Note, following written notice
to the holder of the Note. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Optional Conversion:
At the option of the holder, the Notes may be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price
equal to $0.50 per share. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Additionally, if
the Company elects to exercise the redemption right, the holder has the opportunity to elect to take the cash payment or to
convert all or any portion of the Note into shares of the Company’s common stock. |
|
|
|
|
● |
The conversion price
is subject to proportional adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends and similar corporate events. |
|
|
|
|
● |
The Notes are senior
in rank to any other debt held by our officers, directors or affiliates and may not be subordinated to any other debt issued
by us without the written consent of the holder. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Warrants: The holder
of the Notes is granted the right through October 15, 2015 to purchase 200,000 and 300,000 shares of the Company’s common
stock at $1.00 per share, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
● |
The Notes are secured
by all of the mineral ownership and mining rights held by the Company in the Star Mountain Mining District and proceeds and
distributions from such assets. |
|
|
|
|
● |
The Notes are secured
by all of the mineral ownership and mining rights held by the Company in the Star Mountain Mining District and proceeds and
distributions from such assets. The Notes rank pari passu in right of payment with the other convertible promissory notes
executed under the Company’s offering of the convertible notes in August 2013 and October 2013. |
|
|
|
|
● |
During the time
that any portion of the Notes are outstanding, if any Event of Default occurs and such Default is not cured by the Company
within sixty (60) days of the occurrence of the Event of Default (the “Cure Period”), the amount equal to one
hundred fifty percent (150%) of the outstanding principal amount of this Note, together with accrued interest and other amounts
owing shall become at the holder’s election, immediately due and payable in cash. The holder at its option has the right,
with three (3) business days advance written notice to the Company after the expiration of the Cure Period, to elect to convert
the Note into shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Optional Conversion rights disclosed above. |
The January 22, 2014 and
March 12, 2014 Notes and the Pledge and Security Agreements and Subscription Agreements entered into by the Company and the investor
in connection with the issuance of the respective Notes are substantially identical in form to the Notes, Pledge and Security
Agreements and Subscription Agreements entered into between the Company and the investors in the Company’s offering of its
convertible notes in August 19, 2013 and October 18, 2013.
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS.
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
12%
Convertible Redeemable Promissory Note dated August 19, 2013 between Jameson Stanford Resources Corporation and Joseph Marchal
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 in the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 29, 2013). |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Pledge
and Security Agreement dated August 19, 2013 between Jameson Stanford Resources Corporation and Joseph Marchal (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 in the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 29, 2013). |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Common
Stock Purchase Warrant dated August 19, 2013 between Jameson Stanford Resources Corporation and Joseph Marchal (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 in the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 29, 2013). |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
12%
Convertible Redeemable Promissory Note dated October 18, 2013 between Jameson Stanford Resources Corporation and Edward Brogan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 in the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 24, 2013). |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Pledge
and Security Agreement dated October 18, 2013 between Jameson Stanford Resources Corporation and Edward Brogan (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 in the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 24, 2013). |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
Common
Stock Purchase Warrant dated October 18, 2013 between Jameson Stanford Resources Corporation and Edward Brogan (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 in the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 24, 2013). |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Agreement
of Mutual Understanding and Settlement between Jameson Stanford Resources Corporation and Donald Sutherland dated September
18, 2014 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 in the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 1, 2014). |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
Form
of Amendment to Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated October 27, 2014 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 in the Company’s
Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 29, 2014). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Section
302 Certificate of President and Chief Operating Officer * |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Section
302 Certificate of Interim Chief Financial Officer * |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section
906 Certificate of President and Chief Operating Officer * |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section
906 Certificate of Interim Chief Financial Officer * |
|
|
|
101.INS |
|
XBRL
INSTANCE DOCUMENT ** |
|
|
|
101.SCH |
|
XBRL
TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA ** |
|
|
|
101.CAL |
|
XBRL
TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE ** |
|
|
|
101.DEF |
|
XBRL
TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE ** |
|
|
|
101.LAB |
|
XBRL
TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE ** |
|
|
|
101.PRE |
|
XBRL
TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE ** |
* |
|
Filed
herewith. |
** |
|
In
accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL-formatted interactive data files that comprise Exhibit 101 in this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q shall be deemed “furnished” and not “filed”. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
Jameson
Stanford Resources Corporation |
|
|
|
Date:
November 3, 2014 |
By: |
/s/
Joseph Marchal |
|
|
Joseph Marchal |
|
|
President and
Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive
Officer) |
|
|
|
Date:
November 3, 2014 |
By: |
/s/
Donna S Moore |
|
|
Donna S. Moore |
|
|
Interim Chief
Financial Officer |
|
|
(Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer) |
Exhibit 31.1 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
I, Joseph Marchal, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014 of Jameson Stanford Resources Corporation (the “registrant”);
2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Registrant’s other certifying
officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the Registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over
financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change
in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s
auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Date: November 3, 2014
/s/ Joseph Marchal |
|
Joseph Marchal
President and Chief Operating Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Exhibit 31.2 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
I, Donna S. Moore, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014 of Jameson Stanford Resources Corporation (the “registrant”);
2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Registrant’s other certifying
officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the Registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over
financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change
in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s
auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Date: November 3, 2014
/s/ Donna S. Moore |
|
Donna S. Moore
Interim Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
Exhibit 32.1 Certification of the President and Chief
Operating Officer of Jameson Stanford Resources Corporation pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Jameson Stanford Resources Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Joseph Marchal, President and Chief Operating
Officer the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date:
November 3, 2014 |
By: |
/s/ Joseph Marchal |
|
|
Joseph Marchal |
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
This certification accompanies
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of the
Interim Chief Financial Officer of Jameson Stanford Resources Corporation pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Jameson Stanford Resources Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Donna S. Moore, Interim Chief Financial Officer
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:
(1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date:
November 3, 2014 |
By: |
/s/
Donna S. Moore |
|
|
Donna S. Moore |
|
|
Interim Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
This certification accompanies this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Mongolia Energy (PK) (USOTC:MOAEY)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Out 2024 até Nov 2024
Mongolia Energy (PK) (USOTC:MOAEY)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Nov 2023 até Nov 2024