Global X Nasdaq 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE) Opções

WTH does that mean?

Hei, new DD:

https://eyeopeningstocks.com/articles/8hL0n8qE5Rj1N250dhvE

No, Think1st. This is a scam. There are roughly 6.5 billion shares outstanding with revenue of roughly $500,000. The share price is less than $.01. No, no way would I get involved with this stock.

No, Think1st. This is a scam. There are roughly 6.5 billion shares outstanding with revenue of roughly $500,000. The share price is less than $.01. No, no way would I get involved with this stock.

Found this on X . It reads similar to what was relayed to me about social media. Mine also included the fact that there will be no RS at this time regardless of the outcome of the vote

https://x.com/CLOZER117/status/1905442917180903598?t=jwtFfpHe7CUqFs5Q-_7IHA&s=19

If

$$$ Today is the Day $$$$

$$$$ $FRX $$$

That is Olay

And he also saw the traders loyalty during this whole halt situation, I dont think he going to allow traders to be burnt twice...

Ah great you did see it .

Cheers !

More info from Sharp 😮‍💨 https://x.com/georgeasharp/status/1905406687755874452?s=46

Not only that, but my understanding is that all along, discovery itself has been expected to provide heavy leverage against the MM. Will this discovery extend beyond spoofing to short sales and naked shorting? I'm not a lawyer so I have no idea, but I do expect to see some settlements coming, how so

Last day before Q4. Let's go 🧨🧨🧨

RKT989,

You’re on to something, and I think you’re asking the right questions.

Block 4 is indeed an anomaly.
It’s the only block in the EEZ where only one company—Shell—is named in the PSC. Every other block has a consortium or multiple companies involved. That’s

Kingpindg,

You make a valid point — Shell tends to keep its license acquisitions and divestitures fairly high-level in these reports, without naming every block. Fair enough.

But here’s where I see a potential distinction:

São Tomé is a unique case. Shell

Soon

Never let another man know your move. Basic strategy. If a thief asks where my wallet is, wouldn't it be smarter to tell the location of a decoy? It's not logical to be honest. The world is built on corruption and greed.

I think you fail to grasp the meaning of my earlier message .
The CEO Emil has stated even with approval they have no intention of implementing a RS at this time. Seeking approval now is to save having to schedule another meeting to vote in the future .
There by allowing them to imp

Walter ,
it's clear to me ! When you have the best of the best, a top product that outperforms the competition across the board, it is normal that institutions own a lot of shares. Then it is normal that the competition is afraid of being outclassed. Then it is normal to win an innovation

40 would be an amazing price. Skeptical of such of dip, but will keep an eye open for such an event...

“ Any response to a filing (s) and or an appeal, is always submitted at the last minute. They’ve been doing so for years.”

Almost as if VPLM wanted to spin it out as long as possible rather than bring it to a conclusion as fast as possible.

Now, why would that be?

The question that should be asked is why Polariton decided on using our material and not NLM’s?

They will still need to build out a commercial team. Commercialisation is hard, especially when a company is building it out for the first time.

I identify as a Shelley Belly; I also didn't understand it without further guidance, but...
[pre]
T ransforming
G lobal
L NG
O pportunities[/pre]
As for my submission:
[pre]
T he
G lobe's
L atent
O pulence
[/

That’s your criticism? I’ll take it. Go figure…